Tax the rich? IMF sparks a mini revolution

Google – AFP, Jeremy Tordiman (AFP), 12 October 2013

G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors pose for the G20 family photograph 

during the World Bank/IMF Annual Meetings in Washington on October 11, 2013 (AFP, Mandel Ngan)

Washington — Tax the rich and better target the multinationals: The IMF has set off shockwaves this week in Washington by suggesting countries fight budget deficits by raising taxes.

Tucked inside a report on public debt, the new tack was mostly eclipsed by worries about the US budget crisis, but did not escape the notice of experts and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs).

"We had to read it twice to be sure we had really understood it," said Nicolas Mombrial, the head of Oxfam in Washington. "It's rare that IMF proposals are so surprising."

Guardian of financial orthodoxy, the International Monetary Fund, which is holding its annual meetings with the World Bank this week in the US capital, typically calls for nations in difficulty to slash public spending to reduce their deficits.

A man walks through the rain with a World

 Bank/International Monetary Fund meetings

 umbrella in Washington, DC, October 11,

2013 (AFP, Jim Watson)

But in its Fiscal Monitor report, subtitled "Taxing Times", the Fund advanced the idea of taxing the highest-income people and their assets to reinforce the legitimacy of spending cuts and fight against growing income inequalities.

"Scope seems to exist in many advanced economies to raise more revenue from the top of the income distribution," the IMF wrote, noting "steep cuts" in top rates since the early 1980s.

According to IMF estimates, taxing the rich even at the same rates during the 1980s would reap fiscal revenues equal to 0.25 percent of economic output in the developed countries.

"The gain could in some cases, such as that of the United States, be more significant," around 1.5 percent of gross domestic product, said the IMF report, which also singled out deficient taxation of multinational companies.

In the US alone, legal loopholes deprive the Treasury of roughly $60 billion in receipts, the global lender said.

The 188-nation IMF said that it did not want to enter into a debate on whether the rich should pay more taxes.

But, it said: "The chance to review international tax architecture seems to come about once a century; the fundamental issues should not be ducked."

The IMF managing director, Christine Lagarde, kept up the sales pitch for a more just fiscal policy.

"It's clearly something finance ministers are interested in, it's something that is necessary for the right balance of public finances," said Lagarde, a former French finance minister, in a panel discussion Wednesday.

"There are lot of wasted opportunities," she added.

After the French Socialist government's proposal of a 75 percent tax on the wealthy was overturned by the country's highest court last year, France's finance minister cautiously welcomed the Fund's new direction.

(AFP, Chris Kleponis)

"If the core idea is that fiscal policy is a policy that aims to reduce inequalities, I wouldn't know how to protest against that," Finance Minister Pierre Moscovici said at a news conference in Washington.

The minister said it was a "positive development" but he downplayed that it marked a "significant change" for the IMF.

The Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, which is leading the global battle against tax havens and tax evasion by multinationals, welcomed the IMF at its side.

"We're happy to see this. There is a place for everyone. The Fund can bring a real contribution on economic analyses," Pascal Saint-Amans, head of the OECD's center for tax policy, told AFP.

In the corridors, however, a quiet skirmish is underway between the two organizations for the leadership of the tax-haven offensive ordered by the Group of 20 major economies.

The IMF's Copernican revolution is still in the twilight stage. In its report, the IMF continued to push for a wider scope for value-added tax (VAT), a tax consumption tax that some say is inherently unfair, and on reductions in public spending.

"These proposals are heading in the right direction, but a lot remains to be done," said Oxfam's Mombrial, calling notably for the IMF to do more against illegal capital flows which, according to the NGO, cost billions of dollars in fiscal revenues in the developing countries.

IMF chief Christine Lagarde speaks during an interview with
AFP on June 27, 2013 at IMF Headquarters in Washington
(AFP, Mandel Ngan)

Related Articles:

Lagarde hopes Europe will 'one day' appreciate IMF

Switzerland to vote on $2,800 monthly ‘basic income’ for adults

Offshore Secrets

Hundreds confess to tax office about secret foreign savings accounts

G20 to share tax information by 2015

China joins anti-tax evasion convention

Dutch polish tax image, to 'update' treaties with 23 poor countries

G20 backs plan to stop global tax avoidance and evasion

G8 leaders agree tax evasion measures

Indonesia Welcomes Tax Haven Transparency

British PM strikes 'tax havens' deal ahead of G8

Andorra to introduce income tax for first time

Swiss strike bank deal with US over tax evasion

Singapore Boosts Measures Against Global Tax Cheats

Bermuda and UK territories sign anti-tax evasion deal

Austria to loosen bank secrecy laws within weeks

Luxembourg to ease the secrecy surrounding its banks

Australia to force multinationals to disclose tax arrangements

HMRC in offshore tax evasion crackdown after receiving fresh data

G20 urges global community to end banking secrecy

Major EU countries to tackle tax havens

France's President Hollande: Eradicate tax havens

Dutch MPs call for action on tax havens, plan should be ready by summer

EU deal to tackle mining corruption

French ministers to declare assets publicly

Gibraltar tries to lure London hedge fund bosses with promise of low taxes

Dutch savers have €1.1bn in Luxemburg and Austria: tax office

100 of UK's richest people concealing billions in offshore tax havens

The 'who's who' of European tax havens

Accountancy firms 'use knowledge of Treasury to help rich avoid tax' – MPs

The nation at the heart of the offshore scandal: Britain

Leaks reveal secrets of the rich who hide cash offshore

Dutch finance ministry denies Starbucks tax secrecy claims

Archangel Michael on the World’s Movement into the Golden Age, March 24, 2013 – Part 2/2

“… GW: Shifting to events that are taking place in Europe at this point in time, it seems that the events in Europe are reaching or about to hit a breaking point of some kind. Several leaders, including Nigel Farage and allegedly Russian Prime Minister Medvedev have suggested that people should be removing their money from their accounts as the cabal may attempt a last ditch grab for money.

Now, I know, and perhaps many know, that the current system is corrupt and that there will have to be a degree of change in the current system before people will be willing to embrace the new system.

I don’t wish this question to sound alarmist to people, but is what is happening now one of the final, if not the final, straw that will help expose the banking cabal and allow the new system to be implemented? Is this new system ready? Or is it already being implemented? Or is it still only limited to preparatory work?

AAM: No, it is already underway. It is already being implemented. And yes, we do not wish to sound alarmist either, and so we also wish people to know that their resources, what they think of as their money, for those who have saved and put their faith in banking systems, they will be protected to a certain extent. So do not think that you have need to run out and remove all your monies, or that it will be completely gone. But yes, this is the beginning of a transition.

The expression of the lack of faith in particularly the European banking system causes enormous disruption, more significant perhaps than anywhere else. And so yes, it does have a domino effect, but it is not one simply shutting down [the old system] and a new system emerging. It is coming into balance with the new emerging as the old simply fades away.

Is it a last ditch effort on the part of those who have clung to the old paradigm of the 3rd, what you call the cabal? Yes, it is. But it matters not, because it is not going to work for them. Seldom are things such as this situation so black and white. There is always room for free choice and free movement and adjustment.

But in this situation it is simply evolution and expansion. And the expansion of the new, of the new paradigm, of what you think of as Fifth-Dimensional financial systems does not allow for systems that are based on greed and theft and control — and unfairness, basic unfairness, usury.

So, it is rather clearly defined. You have an expression that you use on Earth, “Out with the old.” And this is one of those situations where it is, in fact, the truth.

GW: Okay. So, along the lines of the leadership, or at least some of the leadership of what’s taking place in the financial sector globally, it has been reported that the apartment of the IMF managing director Christine Lagarde was raided last week.

Was this an attempt to expose her as part of the banking cabal, or was it an attempt to stop her from fulfilling the reforms that she is allegedly trying to bring to the international banking system?

AAM: It was an attempt to gather information and perhaps even destroy documentation that she is trying to bring forth for the reform of the financial situation. It was an unsuccessful raid.

GW: Okay. So what I’m hearing in your answer, then, is that Christine Lagarde is working for, I guess, the forces of light to bring the greater change to the IMF. Am I correct?

AAM: Yes. This one has had a real turn-around. No, we do not ever categorize individuals or groups or people as light or dark. But this one has truly committed herself to reformation.

She sees and she has the experience very clearly of knowing what does not work. And therefore she has committed her mission, her purpose to this reformation.

GW: Okay. And could the same be said about the new US Secretary of the Treasury Jack Lew? Is he on board with all the changes and working for the reformation as well with Lagarde?

AAM: He is an agent and an angel of change. He could not be simply on board. He is a moving force. ‘…‘’