Kryon Berlin Tour & Seminar - Berlin, Germany, Sept 17-22 2019 (Kryon Channelling by Lee Carroll)

Kryon Berlin Tour & Seminar - Berlin, Germany, Sept 17-22 2019 (Kryon Channelling by Lee Carroll)
30th Anniversary of the Fall of the Berlin Wall

Council of Europe (CoE) - European Human Rights Court - founding fathers (1949)

Council of Europe (CoE) - European Human Rights Court - founding fathers (1949)
French National Assembly head Edouard Herriot and British Foreign minister Ernest Bevin surrounded by Italian, Luxembourg and other delegates at the first meeting of Council of Europe's Consultative Assembly in Strasbourg, August 1949 (AFP Photo)

EU founding fathers signed 'blank' Treaty of Rome (1957)

EU founding fathers signed 'blank' Treaty of Rome (1957)
The Treaty of Rome was signed in the Palazzo dei Conservatori, one of the Renaissance palaces that line the Michelangelo-designed Capitoline Square in the Italian capital

Shuttered: EU ditches summit 'family photo'

Shuttered: EU ditches summit 'family photo'
EU leaders pose for a family photo during the European Summit at the EU headquarters in Brussels on June 28, 2016 (AFP Photo/JOHN THYS)

European Political Community

European Political Community
Given a rather unclear agenda, the family photo looked set to become a highlight of the meeting bringing together EU leaders alongside those of Armenia, Azerbaijan, Britain, Kosovo, Switzerland and Turkey © Ludovic MARIN

Merkel says fall of Wall proves 'dreams can come true'


“ … Here is another one. A change in what Human nature will allow for government. "Careful, Kryon, don't talk about politics. You'll get in trouble." I won't get in trouble. I'm going to tell you to watch for leadership that cares about you. "You mean politics is going to change?" It already has. It's beginning. Watch for it. You're going to see a total phase-out of old energy dictatorships eventually. The potential is that you're going to see that before 2013. They're going to fall over, you know, because the energy of the population will not sustain an old energy leader ..."
"Update on Current Events" – Jul 23, 2011 (Kryon channelled by Lee Carroll) - (Subjects: The Humanization of God, Gaia, Shift of Human Consciousness, 2012, Benevolent Design, Financial Institutes (Recession, System to Change ...), Water Cycle (Heat up, Mini Ice Ace, Oceans, Fish, Earthquakes ..), Nuclear Power Revealed, Geothermal Power, Hydro Power, Drinking Water from Seawater, No need for Oil as Much, Middle East in Peace, Persia/Iran Uprising, Muhammad, Israel, DNA, Two Dictators to fall soon, Africa, China, (Old) Souls, Species to go, Whales to Humans, Global Unity,..... etc.)
(Subjects: Who/What is Kryon ?, Egypt Uprising, Iran/Persia Uprising, Peace in Middle East without Israel actively involved, Muhammad, "Conceptual" Youth Revolution, "Conceptual" Managed Business, Internet, Social Media, News Media, Google, Bankers, Global Unity,..... etc.)




"The Recalibration of Awareness – Apr 20/21, 2012 (Kryon channeled by Lee Carroll) (Subjects: Old Energy, Recalibration Lectures, God / Creator, Religions/Spiritual systems (Catholic Church, Priests/Nun’s, Worship, John Paul Pope, Women in the Church otherwise church will go, Current Pope won’t do it), Middle East, Jews, Governments will change (Internet, Media, Democracies, Dictators, North Korea, Nations voted at once), Integrity (Businesses, Tobacco Companies, Bankers/ Financial Institutes, Pharmaceutical company to collapse), Illuminati (Started in Greece, with Shipping, Financial markets, Stock markets, Pharmaceutical money (fund to build Africa, to develop)), Shift of Human Consciousness, (Old) Souls, Women, Masters to/already come back, Global Unity.... etc.) - (Text version)

… The Shift in Human Nature

You're starting to see integrity change. Awareness recalibrates integrity, and the Human Being who would sit there and take advantage of another Human Being in an old energy would never do it in a new energy. The reason? It will become intuitive, so this is a shift in Human Nature as well, for in the past you have assumed that people take advantage of people first and integrity comes later. That's just ordinary Human nature.

In the past, Human nature expressed within governments worked like this: If you were stronger than the other one, you simply conquered them. If you were strong, it was an invitation to conquer. If you were weak, it was an invitation to be conquered. No one even thought about it. It was the way of things. The bigger you could have your armies, the better they would do when you sent them out to conquer. That's not how you think today. Did you notice?

Any country that thinks this way today will not survive, for humanity has discovered that the world goes far better by putting things together instead of tearing them apart. The new energy puts the weak and strong together in ways that make sense and that have integrity. Take a look at what happened to some of the businesses in this great land (USA). Up to 30 years ago, when you started realizing some of them didn't have integrity, you eliminated them. What happened to the tobacco companies when you realized they were knowingly addicting your children? Today, they still sell their products to less-aware countries, but that will also change.

What did you do a few years ago when you realized that your bankers were actually selling you homes that they knew you couldn't pay for later? They were walking away, smiling greedily, not thinking about the heartbreak that was to follow when a life's dream would be lost. Dear American, you are in a recession. However, this is like when you prune a tree and cut back the branches. When the tree grows back, you've got control and the branches will grow bigger and stronger than they were before, without the greed factor. Then, if you don't like the way it grows back, you'll prune it again! I tell you this because awareness is now in control of big money. It's right before your eyes, what you're doing. But fear often rules. …

Saturday, September 6, 2014

Scottish independence may force UK nuclear deterrent rethink

Yahoo – AFP, Katherine Haddon, 6 Sep 2014

The Trident submarines contribute to NATO's collective nuclear deterrent, and their
 removal could jeopardise Britain's status as a permanent member of the United Nations
Security Council, according to some commentators (AFP Photo)

London (AFP) - Britain’s future as a nuclear-armed nation could be thrown into doubt if Scotland votes for independence on September 18, experts say, raising serious questions about its future status in the international community.

The UK's Trident nuclear submarines are currently based at Faslane naval base on a sea loch west of Glasgow surrounded by dramatic mountain scenery.

But the Scottish National Party (SNP), leaders of the pro-independence campaign which is gaining ground in opinion polls, wants them out of Scotland by 2020 if there is a "Yes" vote.

A "Yes" vote in the Scottish independence referendum
 could re-open the debate about whether Britain needs
 a nuclear deterrent, according to some analysts (AFP
Photo/Maurice Mcdonald)
Some say the cost and complexity of a move could force Britain to re-open the debate about whether it needs a nuclear deterrent at all.

"The Americans like us being a nuclear power -- it would cause problems with them. In the NATO alliance it would cause alarm. Can you really remain a permanent member of the Security Council? I don't know," said Lord Alan West, head of Britain's Royal Navy between 2002 and 2006 and an ex-security minister.

His view is shared by figures including Scottish former NATO secretary general George Robertson.

"The forces of darkness will simply love it," Robertson said in April during a speech in Washington. "It might mean the unilateral nuclear disarming of the remainder of the UK."

The SNP, Scotland's ruling party led by First Minister Alex Salmond, describes Trident as "an affront to basic decency with its indiscriminate and inhumane destructive power."

Despite the possible upheaval, Britain's government says it has not done any contingency planning for relocating the facilities at Faslane and nearby Coulport, where warheads are loaded into missiles.

Any such move would be extremely expensive, potentially costing £8 billion (ten billion euros, $13 billion).

This comes against a backdrop of austerity in Britain, where this year's military budget is £33.5 billion as ministers implement eight percent defence cuts in the four years to 2014-15.

"The defence budget couldn't face that," said West, adding that extra money would need to be found.

"There'€™s a distinct possibility that people could say you should just stop being a nuclear power."

The cost of relocating the Royal Navy's four Trident nuclear-armed submarines
 from the Faslane naval base in Scotland could be as high as £8 billion (ten billion
euros, $13 billion), according to some military experts (AFP Photo/Andy Buchanan)

Other problems would include finding a suitable alternative site and the timing of the move, likely to take longer than the SNP's deadline.

Ageing submarines

Professor Malcolm Chalmers of defence think-tank the Royal United Services Institute said: "Our estimate is that sometime around 2028 would be an appropriate time to complete the move."

Britain’s nuclear-armed status has underpinned its standing as a diplomatic power for decades.

Under a deal sealed at the height of the Cold War, the US supplies Britain with nuclear missiles.

While formally only the British prime minister can authorise their use, they are part of NATO's collective deterrent.

President Barack Obama hinted at the importance of Trident to the US in July, saying he wanted Britain to remain "a strong, robust, united and effective partner".

There are four submarines in the Trident fleet, at least one of which is on patrol somewhere in the world 24 hours a day.

The Scottish National Party (SNP) wants to
 remove the Trident nuclear-armed submarines
 from the Faslane naval base by 2020, but 
experts say they might not be relocated until
2028 (AFP Photo/Maurice Mcdonald)
But the Scottish independence vote comes at what is already a crucial moment in its history.

The submarines are ageing and ministers will take the main decisions on replacing them in 2016.

Even within the British government, this is controversial. Prime Minister David Cameron’s coalition partners, the Liberal Democrats, want to end 24 hour patrols and procure one less submarine to replace Trident.

Despite the uncertainty, some play down the prospect of Britain giving up its deterrent anytime soon.

Chalmers said London would not want to give up such a symbol of international prestige after such a "major shock".

"There would be a sense of humiliation in the UK, fears about how the UK is seen internationally, so it would be a big step to be seen to be giving up its nuclear force," he said.


Related Articles:




No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.